Fraudulent Misrepresentation


Business and Real Estate Disputes Information Center:
__________________

Slope Failure & Sinkhole Damage

Texas Business Lawyer

Texas Business Litigation

Texas Business Dispute Attorney

Texas Business Law

Understanding Buy-Sell Agreements

San Antonio Business Litigation Attorney

Texas Business Lawyers

Commercial Litigation

What is "Commercial Litigation?"

Business Lawyer

Business Litigation Lawyer

Real Estate Lawyer

Texas Business Litigation Attorneys

Business Issues

Why Even a Simple Contract can Save Your Bacon

Fraudulent Misrepresentation

Understanding Construction Law and Construction Litigation
To recover on an action for fraud, the party must prove that:
  1. a material misrepresentation was made;
  2. it was false;
  3. when the speaker made the representation he knew it was false or made it recklessly without any knowledge of the truth and as a positive assertion;
  4. the speaker made it with the intention that it should be acted upon by the party;
  5. the party acted in reliance upon it;
  6. the party thereby suffered injury.
The Texas Supreme Court has held that this framework for fraud includes the Restatement (Second) of Torts section 531’s reason-to-expect standard. Holding that our fraud jurisprudence has traditionally focused not on whether the misrepresentation is directly transmitted to a person alleged to be in privity with fraudfeasor, but on whether the misrepresentation was intended to reach a third person and induce reliance.

Under section 531, a person who makes a misrepresentation is liable to the person or class of persons the maker intends or “has reason to expect” will act in reliance upon the misrepresentation.Thus, although a misrepresentation need not be directly communicated by the speaker to the relying party, a misrepresentation must reach the relying party and influence his conduct.