Common Defenses in Dallas Dog Bite Cases and How to Overcome Them

Dallas, Texas is a rich dog-loving community and a place where playful canine companions brighten our lives. However, when a dog bite incident occurs, understanding your legal rights and the common dog attack legal defenses used in this type of cases becomes crucial. This article explores the typical defenses dog owners may employ in Dallas dog owner negligence claims and how victims can overcome them. If you find yourself entangled in a dog bite incident, seeking legal assistance from Dallas personal injury attorneys at Carabin Shaw can be your key to success.

Dog owners may argue that the victim provoked the dog in some way, leading to the attack. However, provocation must be significant and deliberate to serve as a valid defense.

Overcoming Provocation: To counter this defense, gather evidence to show that your actions did not provoke the dog in any way. Witness statements, photographs, and medical records can be valuable in establishing that you were not at fault.

Another common defense is the assertion that the victim was trespassing on the dog owner's property. Dog owners may claim that you had no right to be on their premises, and therefore, they should not be held responsible for your injuries.

Overcoming Trespassing: If you can demonstrate that you were legally on the property, the defense of trespassing is unlikely to hold. Evidence like invitations, photographs, or witnesses can be useful in countering this defense.

Some dog owners may argue that you willingly assumed the risk of being bitten by the dog. This defense may be used if you were aware of the dog's aggressive tendencies but chose to interact with it anyway.

Overcoming Assumption of Risk: To counter this defense, you can show that you were not aware of the dog's dangerous behavior or that the owner misrepresented the dog's temperament. It's essential to provide evidence demonstrating your lack of awareness and how you were misled.

In some cases, the dog owner may claim that they were not the owner of the dog in question. This defense is often used to avoid liability.

Overcoming Lack of Ownership: If you can prove that the person you are holding responsible is indeed the owner of the dog, their defense of not owning the dog will crumble. Records such as dog licenses, veterinary bills, or witness testimony can help establish ownership.

Contributory negligence is a defense in which the dog owner argues that the victim's own negligence played a significant role in the dog bite incident. This defense can potentially reduce the victim's compensation.

Overcoming Contributory Negligence: If you can show that your actions were reasonable and that the dog owner's negligence was the primary cause of the attack, you can counter this defense effectively.

Overcoming these common defenses can be challenging, especially when dealing with the complexities of the legal system. That's where an experienced Dallas personal injury lawyer at Carabin Shaw comes in. We have a deep understanding of Texas dog bite liability and can help you navigate the legal process, gather essential evidence, and build a compelling case to maximize your compensation.

At Carabin Shaw, we offer a free case review to assess the details of your case and discuss your legal options. Additionally, we offer our services on a contingency-fee basis, meaning you won't pay us unless we secure compensation for you.

When facing Dallas dog bite defenses, it's essential to be well-prepared and backed by an experienced legal team. Your path to success involves the personal injury attorneys at Carabin Shaw.

Our commitment to our clients is reflected in our Carabin Shaw reviews, and our services are provided on a contingency-fee basis to ensure you receive the compensation you deserve after a dog bite incident in Dallas, Texas. Contact our team 24/7, toll-free at 800-862-1260 and let our English and Spanish speaking team help you seek justice and overcome the common defenses used in dog bite cases.

For more information:

• Texas Statutes
• Cornell Law